September 2nd – One of the little
experiments I’d like to do (but will probably never get round to) is to put
together a gender evening; let me explain.
There’s no doubt in my mind that men and women
see things differently, not necessarily in the major things concerning right
and wrong or suchlike, but in the nuances and reasoning of a situation or
series of events. I know that, if you were to take this through to its natural
conclusion we could bypass all this and say, well, yes, but then everybody sees
things differently. Depending on nature, nurture and history the reading of a
certain event or trail of events will be interpreted accordingly. This aside (I
can do that ‘cos I’m writing this) and taken as read, what I think would be
instructive is, as I say, a gender evening.
Say, for instance, if I wrote a short play, a
one-acter, and put it on in a small 250-seater somewhere. It could be about the
gradual break up of a marriage, say, or the problems in caring for an elderly
relative and would involve four players; two of each sex. There’d be two
performances, one at, say 19.00 and the next at 20.30 and the same play would
be performed both times in as near as dammit the exact same way each time.
Allowing for the vagaries of the actors (I mean, actors…right?) and trying to
enforce on them the need for continuity (let’s face it, a big ask, but…) and
ensuring that all the technical details remained constant, let’s say we have it
performed under normal, indoor lighting (that’ll please the sound guys) and
minimal sound F/X (that’ll please the l/x guys). Performance 1 is for men only;
performance 2 is for women only. We keep them separate until both sets of folk
have seen the show then we get them together and let them discuss the gig; I’ll
bet, even though they’ve seen the exact same show they’d read the nuances and
outcomes differently. No revelations there, I’m aware, it’d just be interesting
to know. Look out for next week’s revelation when I’ll be describing an
experiment where we take a dozen rats and introduce them into the trousers of
six politicians and see if we can get them to talk even more bollocks.
Puppetry of
the Penis
(I have to be honest and say that, when I first saw a poster for this show in
Edinburgh, what, ten-plus years ago, I misread it and wondered how you could
possibly wring an evening’s entertainment out of a pocketful of loose change)
is one such show that would certainly create two completely different takes on
the message contained within the art from both sexes attending, although my
guess is the women will outnumber the men four to one so a bias would be
introduced. The phrase;
That’s some
cock
means two completely different things depending
on the sex of the person saying it and where the emphasis lies. Tom Jones
elicited much the same audience response when he was in his prime (was he
ever?) See? Straight away you have the jealous
male gene showing up; that would immediately spoil the sample.
Teddy Pendergrass locked onto this idea I
described earlier back in 1978. On this day he played a midnight show for Women Only in
No comments:
Post a Comment